Wealth Wisdom System

Hate Your Job? You Have LOTS of Other Options!

Rent Prices on the Rebound. Finally.

For those of you following my progress with Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System, I thought you would like to read this article about apartment rents.

Apartment rents rose during the first quarter, ending five straight quarters of declines and signaling the worst may be over for the hard-hit sector.

Nationally, the apartment vacancy rate stayed flat at 8%, the highest level since Reis Inc., a New York research firm, began its tally in 1980.

Reis tracks vacancies and rents in the top 79 U.S. markets, and rents rose in 60 of them, led by Miami, Seattle and New York—all cities that have notched big rental declines in the past year.

Rents increased 1.6% in the first quarter in Miami and 0.9% in New York. The gains came during what is usually a seasonally weak period for apartments and suggested that landlords may have some momentum heading into the peak spring and summer leasing season.

“Deterioration seems not to have just been arrested but reversed,” said Victor Calanog, director of research for Reis. “Several markets have bottomed and may be on track to recovery,” he said.

Nationally, effective rents, which include concessions such as one month of free rent, rose 0.3% during the quarter compared with a 0.7% decline in the fourth quarter of last year and a 1.1% drop in the first quarter of 2009. Vacancies are tied to unemployment, because many would-be renters move in with family members or double up during a downturn.

“We clearly hit an inflection point in all of our markets in January and February,” said Jeffrey Friedman, chief executive of Associated Estates Realty Corp., which owns and operates 12,000 units in the eastern U.S.

Renters are also staying put longer: the average renter now stays for 19 months, up from an average of 14 months, said Mr. Friedman, and despite low mortgage rates and greater home affordability, fewer renters are leaving to buy homes.

“This is the first time in many, many years that it feels like even people who could afford to buy are making the investment decision not to,” Mr. Friedman said.

Difficulty in obtaining financing for new apartment construction, meanwhile, has limited the supply of new units that will be added in the coming years. Those fundamentals have landlords and investors excited about the potential for rents to pop once the economy gathers steam.

Read the whole thing

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Investing in Apartment Buildings: There is Hope in 2010

For those of you following my progress with Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System, I thought you would like to read this article about multifamily sales by Mark Heschmeyer.

Large dollar property sales seem to be emitting faint sparks of hope for the commercial real estate outlook so far in 2010, particularly in the multifamily and hospitality sectors.

To be certain, the number of property sales with price tags of $5 million or more still declined 16% in January from the number of sales in January 2009, according to CoStar Group Inc. And that was a steeper decrease than seen in November and December.

However, that decrease in dollar volume can be attributed to fewer deals and smaller properties being sold. The average size of the properties sold this past January was 5% smaller than a year ago, and the number of deals was down 15%. That helped raise, the average price per square foot being paid for institutional-quality properties from $141 per square foot to $149 per square foot January to January, the third month in a row that the average price paid was more than it was in the year-earlier period.

What’s more, multifamily sales in the $5 million and up category increased 50% over the year earlier. This was the second month out of the last three that multifamily sales had increased month over month. Apartment sales were up in November and flat in December.

Hospitality property sales also took a huge upward turn in January – up more than 250% over the year-earlier period. Although, it was the first monthly increase since the recession started, the trend over the last four months has clearly been improving for hotel properties. They were down 58% in October 2009 compared to October 2008, but down only 1% in the December-to-December period.

While no one is jumping to the conclusion that the results clearly indicate commercial real estate has turned a corner, they do appear to lend more credence to the belief that a painfully slow rebound may be in progress.

“We’ll see more transactions involving institutional quality property because buyers are beginning to understand that prices for top-quality properties may be at or near a bottom,” said Bob Bach, chief economist at Grubb & Ellis. “I think we’ll see a gradual increase in sales this year of perhaps 20% to 30% or possibly considerably more.”

“We’ll also see [more activity in] Class B and C troubled assets in secondary and tertiary markets because lenders realize there’s no reason to hang on for better prices because these properties will be the last to recover,” Bach said. “Prices are expected to drift moderately lower, more into the strike zone where buyers and sellers will start to make deals. But the pricing correction is [still] probably [only] two-thirds to three-quarters over with.”

In addition to attractive pricing and lenders more willing to sell, confidence from the resumption of job growth is also expected to stimulate the willingness among investors to seek outsized returns by taking on greater risk.

As CoStar’s Property and Portfolio Research (PPR) noted in its 2010 Predictions white paper, “Once we start getting a couple of months of positive job numbers, particularly if there is an accelerating trend, we’re going to see a lot of investors interested in cashing in on the opportunities that are out there, whether this means acquiring half-empty buildings or taking on assets with big lease-roll exposures.”

According to PPR, the best-performing opportunity funds from a vintage standpoint have been those that are executed in the last year of a recession or the first year of the recovery. Looking back to the last downturn, 2001 and 2002 vintage funds were the best-performing opportunity funds over the previous eight years.

Multifamily Investment Sales

“There has undoubtedly been an uptick in transaction velocity in multifamily deals, and I believe it is due to a variety of factors,” said Darron Kattan, partner and senior multifamily broker for Franklin Street Real Estate Services in Tampa, FL. “Multifamily is always the top choice of investment dollars and therefore there are a lot of buyers looking for deals. Nothing new in this cycle versus previous where multifamily is the first to recover due in large part to the availability of buyers. Multifamily was actually the first to hit the distressed radar screen, with the shortest term leases (outside of hotels), and therefore became the first to get hit hard by the downturn and land on asset managers’ desks at lenders and servicing companies, and therefore are the first working through the system.”

In addition, Kattan noted that AIMCO and Equity Residential were large net sellers in 2009 due to balance sheet and stock pricing issues. That, he said, opened the door for attractive deals to hit the market.

Tim Wang, vice president, senior investment strategist for ING Clarion in New York noted that Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and HUD have been dominating the multifamily financing.

“This is the only property sector that you can still lever up to 75% loan to value and have positive leverage to juice up investment returns,” Wang said. “The Fed plans to end its $1.25 trillion mortgage debt purchase program by the end of next month, which could potentially lead to an increase in GSE mortgage rates. So, there is a rush in the marketplace to take advantage of the attractive financing terms and do multifamily deals before this deadline.”

Hospitality Investment Sales

“Hotel demand is highly correlated with economic growth,” Wang said. “Historically, it is one of the first property sectors to recover after recession. The sector is definitely improving, albeit from probably the steepest downturn in the U.S. lodging industry history. We are seeing generally stabilized occupancy while the average daily room rate is still declining but at a slower rate. The major difference in this downturn is that there was excess hotel supply delivered to the market in 2008-2009. Consequently, the revenue per available room recovery this time around could be slower than in the past.”

Gordon L Wicker, chief operations officer for AXIA Real Estate Appraisers in Tucson, AZ, said, “with respect to the hospitality market statewide, average daily room rates and average daily occupancies remain well off 2007 numbers, so most sales activity in the larger regional/national market appears to be an increase in activity from REITs both as a long-term investment, and also due to a lack of attractive investment alternatives.”

Timothy D. Chamberlain, principal at Koda Ventures LLC, and senior director at Lee Kennedy Co. Inc. in Quincy, MA, also noted that hospitality, while still distressed, is becoming appropriately priced.

“Hospitality is discounted enough to start to move and apartments represent stabilized cash flow, which is what the market wants today,” Chamberlain said. “All other classes are getting kicked down the road and are not yet priced appropriately for a reasonable risk adjusted return.”

Office, Industrial and Retail Investment Sales

“There will be an uptick in volume in 2010, but not much,” Chamberlain said. “2011-’12 will be an active years for the industrial, office and retail food groups.”

Of the three primary commercial real estate property sectors, 2010 investment sales numbers seem to indicate that office properties have improved the most over 2009. For starters, the pace at which sales have been declining has slowed dramatically. October 2009 sales were 50% fewer than they were in October 2008. That dropped to 24% fewer for December 2009 over December 2008. And in January of this year, office property sales of $5 million and up were off just 6% from what they were a year earlier. Notably, the average price per square foot is down dramatically from what it was a year ago: $158 compared to $202.

Retail and industrial property sales were still way down from year earlier numbers. Retail sales in January totaled 38% less the year-earlier period and industrial sales declined 68% month over month.

“Retail will generally continue to struggle until investors can get a feel for when occupancy rates and net operating incomes will stop deteriorating,” said Mac McCall, senior director of Franklin Street Real Estate Services in Atlanta, GA. “With many retailers continuing to see declining sales, especially mom and pops, vacancy rates will continue to tick up without the added boost of increased employment in the overall economy.”

“Additionally,” McCall continued, “if you factor in the potential of bank-owned retail properties hitting the market in the coming years, buyers of this product will be able to get away with charging lower rents because their acquisition basis is much lower than their neighboring properties which were either built or acquired during the peak of the cycle and therefore have to charge higher rents to justify their mortgage payments. Both of these key factors make it a tough sell to a potential investor to invest in an asset with so much uncertainty regarding future cash flows.”

Manish Rajguru, who oversees the evaluation of CMBS and other CRE debt instruments at Red Pine Advisors LLC in New York, said that, “the industrial [property sector] should increase, especially those related to trade (exports in particular). The office and retail property sectors should continue to lag given uncertainty of growth in office using employment and consumer respectively (and General Growth Properties’ fallout as some malls will have to be repositioned/closed).”
Buyer Demographics

The buyer profile of institutional quality properties has shifted in the last four months from what it was a year earlier. Developer/owner and investment manager buyers continue to be the primary buyers of properties and, in fact, have increased their outlay year over year. Developer/owner purchases were up to about $7.3 billion in the last four months compared to $6.8 billion in the same period a year earlier; and investment manager buys were up to $5.5 billion from $3.7 billion.

REITs and corporate buyer have decreased their buying activity in the last four months from a year ago. REIT activity was down slightly from $5.4 billion to $5 billion; and corporate buying activity was down from $3.5 billion to $2.6 billion.

Notably, it appears that banks and financial institutions have stepped up their foreclosure activity. Bank/finance firms accounted for $1.9 billion in purchases in the last four months up from $480 million in the same period a year earlier.

Source

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

90-Unit Apartment Complex for Sale in Los Angeles

I know some of you are just starting your real estate investing career. I want you to think big and see what’s possible when you stick with it.

Pacific Property Co. is offering for sale the Madison, a 90-unit upscale apartment complex in Rancho Palos Verdes, CA.

The Palo Alto, CA, investor had acquired the property in 2005 in a venture with what was then GMAC Institutional Advisors for $26.4 million. At the time, the property was actually two complexes, Ocean View Apartments, with 57 units at 6507 Ocean Crest Drive, and Ocean Crest Apartments, with 33 units at 6510 Ocean Crest Drive. The two were built in the early 1970s.

Since buying them, Pacific Property has made substantial renovations and combined the two properties, which are close to downtown Los Angeles, Torrance and Long Beach. More than half of the property’s units, which average more than 1,200 square feet, have views of the Pacific Ocean. Some have views of Catalina Island.

Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services’ Los Angeles office is marketing the property with an asking price of $24.5 million.

Haven’t gotten started yet?

Step 1. Get Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System

Step 2. Start building business credit

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Need a Cap Rate Report for 2009?

For those of you who are using Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System, I know you have a new found interest in cap rates. Do you need reports for 2009?

We are pleased to present the CBRE Capital Markets Cap Rate Survey for the second half of 2009, which highlights investment trends for all property types in each of the key markets across the US. For this survey, our Capital Markets professionals provided their estimation of current cap rate ranges and investor activity in their local market. These cap rates are based on recent interactions that our professionals have had with active investors in their market.

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

US Residential Investment: A Sleeping Giant

For those of you smart people who are following my progress in buying my first apartment building using
Monica Main’s Apartment Cash Flow System (and hopefully taking steps toward buying your own), I thought you might like this article by CBRE Econometric Advisors Glab Nechayev and William Wheaton.

Residential investment is no longer a drag on the US economy. Instead, it will slowly return to being a major driver of domestic GDP growth and should play an important role in this recovery for a number of years.

Despite being a relatively small share of the U.S. gross domestic product (typically 3-4% of GDP), residential investment can have a more dramatic effect on GDP growth. This happens when residential investment increases or decreases. As the chart below shows, during the recessions of 1973-75 and 1980-82, residential investment subtracted close to a full percent from annual GDP growth but the added just as much in the first year or two of the subsequent recovery. In the last decade, residential investment’s effect was more sustained. In the thirteen years between 1993 and 2005 it added an average of 0.25% each year to GDP growth as construction steadily increased from 1.2 to 2.1 million units.

Housing Starts

Residential investment is realized through new construction activity and the relationship between the change in housing starts and residential investment’s contribution to GDP growth has been very close historically, as the chart above illustrates. Since housing starts peaked at an annualized pace of over 2.1 million units in 2006Q1, residential investment plunged and this has had a strong negative impact on economic growth. Starts declined continuously since then — finally bottoming out at a record low of 530,000 in 2009Q1 — two thirds below their historical average. During this period residential investment was subtracting about 1% from GDP growth on a yearly basis.

With housing starts increasing by 50,000 units in 2009Q3, residential investment added 0.5% to that quarter’s GDP growth — the first positive contribution in over three years. That is exactly what one would expect given the relationship observed historically between changes in housing starts and residential investment’s effect! So going forward into 2010 and beyond, just how much of a contribution to the U.S. GDP growth could residential investment provide?

To answer this question, one needs to consider where new supply (housing starts) currently is relative to new demand (primarily from household formation) as well as the existing housing overhang. At first it may seem surprising that housing starts would be rising at all given recent job losses, an already record-high residential vacancy rate, and foreclosure rates. Census is reporting that in 2009 there is over a million year-round vacant units for rent and for sale than when the housing correction began, and that new housing demand, measured by changes in the number of household (occupied units) are about 700,000 per year — half the historical average.

With annual housing demolitions of about 300,000 units, housing “demand” in 2009 has been about a million units — or twice the current construction. Moving into 2010, household formation should recover a bit — perhaps to 0.9 million, creating demand of 1.2 million. If construction rebounds a bit further — to about 700,000, then again there would remain “excess demand” of 0.5 million units. In short, by the end of 2010 — there should be little excess inventory.

From 2011 on, we should return to a more stable long term housing demand of 1.4 million units (1.1 million from household formation plus 0.3 million from demolitions and second home demand). Supposing construction still does not meet all of this demand (hence allowing prices to rise) it is quite reasonable to expect 2011 starts to increase to 0.9 million and then to 1.1 million in 2012, and finally 1.3 million in 2013.

This trajectory of “under supply” should allow prices to continue in recovery mode for the full 2010 to 2013 period. In such a scenario (graphed as a forecast in the chart above), the recovery of housing construction generates a 0.8% annual contribution to GDP growth — for 4 years. This cumulative boost of over 3% is far greater than during the recoveries from previous recessions and is exceeded only by the ramping up of housing construction right after World War II.

As a final point, we suggest that the year-to-date demand for new homes actually has been quite strong — it is only low in magnitude because we are not building any! In normal years, new home sales are about 75% of single family starts. The other 25% of units are in some sense “pre-sold” and directly contracted for. As shown in the chart below, during the last several quarters, this part of the market seems to have dried up as the sale of units in the pipeline has gobble dup virtually every new start. It is not surprising that all of the recent increase in overall housing starts was driven by the single-family segment which is already adding volume in expectation of a more robust demand down the road.

Housing Sales

Thus despite the glut of existing homes, there is still demand for new product. In fact one might argue that at current depressed construction levels there may even be “excess dmenad” — for newly constructed homes. This exists mainly in those parts of the country that did not over-build and that have been less hard hit by the recession. As a broader economic recovery solidifies in the coming years, residential investment will have to grow — a great deal, for a sustained period. Housing construction is a sleeping giant that is about to wake up.

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Amazing Financing for Apartment Buildings

For those of you who have purchased, (or who are thinking about purchasing) Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System, I wanted to share some good news on getting financing for your acquisition. I got this from Mr. Tracy A. Beer, Managing Director at MCB-Madison Finance.

There’s lots of talk these days about what’s hard to finance, the tough terms Lenders demand and the scarcity of capital. However, there are some amazingly good Lending programs out there and that’s what I’ll write about today.

APARTMENT FINANCING
There isn’t much government gets right. Congress’s pushing Fannie and Freddie to broaden their acceptable credit criteria played an instrumental role in the collapse. However, Fannie and Feddie are offering acceptionally good financing now…unintentionally.

Permanent Financing
While Freddie Mac offers good programs at good rates, they are not as aggressive or permissive as is Fannie Mae. Rates for “Low Leverage” – up to 75% Loan to Value are under 5.00%! Those rates are as low as 4.69%!

For “Full Leverage” – up to 80% Loan to Value rates are at 6.15% for a ten-year term! These rates make no sense and are anywhere from 75 to 350 basis points below Lifecos (who will only fund to 65 or 70% LTV) These loans are Non-recourse, Assumable and can fund more loan amount as income grows.

This program is hands down the best deal out there!

Now that the Feds are “officially” fully backing Fannie, things will change. We have seen loan to value ratios drop from a high of 85% in the last few months and we can’t believe rates will continue to be so low in comparison with the rest of the capital market. Get ‘em while you still can!!

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Apartments: It Gets Better

I just read this report by Gleb Nechayev, VP and Senior Economist of the CBRE Econometric Advisors. A lot of you have been following my progress with Monica Main’s Apartment Cash Flow System so I thought you would be interested to read this too.

The new year promises to be a better one for the apartment sector. With the U.S. economy expected to show some improvement in 2010, our outlook for multi-housing is cautiously optimistic. Rental demand should strengthen due to a more robust overall household formation and declining homeownership rate. With completions of new multi-housing product dropping sharply from the current pace, most markets are likely to see moderate improvement in occupancy and less severe effective rent declines in 2010, with additional momentum in 2011.

While the worst of the job losses are behind us, aftershocks such as rising unemployment and foreclosure rates, are still a concern for the economy. Today’s record overhang of vacant year-round housing still poses tangible risk to home prices and rents in many markets. In this respect, the national apartment market will remain in uncharted waters in terms of vacancy rates until the broader housing market shows convincing signs of recovery. In general, areas with stable employment bases, limited supply overhang, and declining affordability of owning should fare better in terms of apartment rate and revenue growth. Even in submarkets, however, property performance can vary widely depending on product type, condition, amenities, and street location.

Demand Trends
After a steep loss in apartment demand by the consumer over the first year of the depression, 2009 is on track for a positive net absorption. Property managers are offering incentives to attract and retain renters even in markets that are doing relatively well, possibly in anticipation of traditionally weak year-end leasing and uncertain early months of [this] year. It is encouraging to see that renters are taking advantage of these discounts as evidenced by improving net absorption. As the economy continues to improve and housing becomes less affordable, these concessions will dissipate and allow for effective rent growth to resume after 2010.

[my note: I'm pretty sure that means to BUY an apartment building NOW!]

More…

The total rental demand (i.e., including 1 to 4 unit family housing) continues to expand at near-record pace. This recent growth is a result of overall household formation and changes in homeownership rate, with the latter contributing the most. Over the five year period ending mid-2009, about 3.5 million households were added to the national rental pool, including in excess of a million households [in 2008]. With foreclosures still on the rise and home mortgage lending more stringent, homeownership is likely to continue falling from its current rate of 67.4% to about 66.0% by the end of [2010], boosting growth in rental households even further — perhaps by as much as a million above the long-term trend of 350,000 to 400,000 per year.

Homeownership Trends

Such record expansion in total rental demand provides a timely cushion for apartment occupancy — without it, the impact of record job losses on property performance would be much more negative. While declining homeownership does create a near-term tail-wind for apartments, it is important that foreclosures begin to taper off [this] year allowing home prices to stabilize and start recovering. A prolonged slump can lead to a tangible loss in apartments’ market share to other forms of housing. Conversely, stead or rising home sales and prices will make ownership less affordable, which would support increased rental demand over time, especially given the favorable age demographics.

Even in the environment of rapidly growing total rental demand, apartment properties will have to complete aggressively to retain existing tenants and attract new ones, especially those of good quality. There is evidence that markets with higher total vacancy rates also tend to see higher apartment rates. Not surprisingly, single-family prices and rents in such areas are also generally more affordable — another factor limiting apartment rent growth.

Supply Trends

One factor that should help ease competitive pressures on apartments next year is a minor reduction in new multi-housing supply. Judging by the number of projects which started in 2009, completions of properties with five or more units are expected to drop from the current annual pace of 250,000 units to about half that figure in 2010. Market-rate apartments will comprise fewer than 70,000 units nationally — less than half the average level of the prior twenty years and a new historical low for this segment.

The exact timing of deliveries does vary, however, and many projects are often deferred during recessions. There are still over 50,000 apartment units which started in 2008, whose current status is unclear. If construction for most of these projects was deferred rather than abandoned, the actual completions in 2010 could be significantly higher than expected.

Given today’s record-high apartment vacancy and depressed rents, however, completions are still likely to drop below historically low levels last seen in the aftermath of the real estate burst of the early 1990s. Moreover, a slow recovery in fundamentals along with highly constrained residential construction lending (at least for the moment) would limit the subsequent recovery in total multi-housing completions, keeping them at very low annual levels of about 100,000 units over the next few years. Some argue that a combination of record low new supply and pent-up rental demand would create conditions for above-average rent increases, or “spikes,” in 2011 to 2013 nationwide.

Housing Supply Trends

In our view, such a case can be made in markets with low housing affordability, high barrier to development, and sharp declines in apartment rent and revenues this this year and next.

2010 Outlook

The near-term outlook for apartment rents and revenues calls for a gradual recovery from the record declines experienced in 2009. Positive net absorption expected in 2010 should bring the national vacancy rate to 7.0%, or about 100 basis points below the peak. While the vacancy rate level will remain over 150 basis points above the long-term average next year, demand momentum is expected to curb further spread of rent discounts and concessions for new leases resulting in progressively smaller effective rent declines. Since the roots of this recession are in housing, however, cumulative peak-to-trough loss in apartment rents and revenues nationally will be more severe than after the 2001 recession and more comparable to those sustained in the early 1990s. After the 2001 recession, apartment performance benefited from rapidly rising home prices and massive rent-to-own conversions. It is just the opposite situation now: there is a record inventory of vacant single-family homes and condominiums, falling home prices, and own-to-rent conversions.

Job Growth

Employment trends aside, housing affordability is a key factor affecting apartments in this cycle and contributing to wider differentiation in rent growth across markets, submarkets, and product types. Variation in performance, already much wider than it has been historically, will likely widen even more as markets adjust to new economic realities. For the first time in over a decade apartment owners and managers have to operate in the environment when the primium to buy a median-priced single-family home or a condominium is much smaller relative to rents.

Declining homeownership rates and rising propensity to rent does boost aggregate rental demand but employment and household growth are more important for apartments. With fewer workers and households and reduced incomes, potential apartments demand cannot be realized, especially in locations with an over-supply of vacant single-family homes and condominiums for rent and for sale.

There are some signs, however, that home prices are stabilizing. The recent decline in sale duration for single-family homes indicates that markets are functioning as expected. A plunge in new house completions helped keep for-sale inventory at bay, and low prices attracted more buyers, including investors. It it important to look behind this facade, however, to see that much of the recent improvement is accounted for by Arizona, California, Florida, and Nevada — states whose housing busts were common among the triggers for the financial crisis and the national recession.

While home sales are indeed leveling out, these steep job losses of late-2008 and early-2009 have affected regular borrowers and foreclosures on fixed-rate mortgages now drive much of the distress. In California, Florida, and Nevada, current unemployment rates are not only well above the national average, they are also above their own historical peaks. Labor markets in these states must improve quickly ot they will risk facing new negative impacts from housing that can have national implications once again.

Stabilization and subsequent recovery in the labor market and home prices are both key to the multi-housing outlook. Judging by the current conditions, a tangible improvement in fundamentals is unlikely to begin for another year or so. We don’t expect “heaven in 2011″ either, but the road to a real recovery in apartment rents and revenues should clear by then.

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System – Day 56

In my last post about my progress with Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System, I told you about the first deal I submitted to Monica, and how I learned that the 126-unit complex was overpriced…and the seller wasn’t willing to come down on the price.

You know how the holiday’s get a little crazy, what with all the baking and the future in-laws to visit? There were a lot of days were I didn’t have the time I wanted to review properties. I’m big into using my time as productively as I can, especially during all that time that’s usually wasted — you know, while you’re waiting for your doctor to honor his time commitment to you, or when you’re waiting for a second post office employee to get back from lunch. So during those little scraps of time I managed to read a small volume by Dan Kennedy called No B.S. Time Management for Entrepreneurs: The Ultimate, No Holds Barred, Kick Butt, Take No Prisoners, Guide to Time, Productivity, and Sanity (Self-Counsel Business Series)

I also did an exercise [pdf] that’s supposed to be way more effective than the standard New Year’s Resolutions. My word is “visionary.” You’ll understand what that means after you do the exercise.

Once things settled down, all my pent-up desire to get back to reviewing properties kind of exploded, and, within a few days, I had three potential deals:

  1. a 192-unit property that cash flows at $24,353 per month
  2. a 134-unit property that cash flows at $14,283 per month
  3. a 164-unit property that cash flows at $18,185 per month

I’ve sent them to Monica and am awaiting word.

But now that I’m awaiting word, I don’t just sit around fantasizing about what precisely I would do with $56,821 per month. I’m still reviewing properties and talking to brokers. Today I talked to my first seller.

He owns a 115 unit property and wants to sell because he has three kids in college right now. They’ve got properties all over the country, so he figured he’d just sell off one of them to pay his kids’ tuition. My question is: why would his kids want to waste four or five years buying a permission slip for an entry level position when their father already knows how to generate a passive income? Anyway, he’s going to send me more information so that I can use Monica’s spreadsheet to see if it would be a good deal or not.

If you haven’t already done so, I encourage you to get your copy of Monica’s apartment building course here.

I’ll let you know what Monica says about my three deals when I find out.

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email