Wealth Wisdom System

Hate Your Job? You Have LOTS of Other Options!

Need a Cap Rate Report for 2009?

For those of you who are using Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System, I know you have a new found interest in cap rates. Do you need reports for 2009?

We are pleased to present the CBRE Capital Markets Cap Rate Survey for the second half of 2009, which highlights investment trends for all property types in each of the key markets across the US. For this survey, our Capital Markets professionals provided their estimation of current cap rate ranges and investor activity in their local market. These cap rates are based on recent interactions that our professionals have had with active investors in their market.

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System – Day 109

I know it’s been a little while since I last told you my discouraging news that Monica didn’t like the property analyses I had sent her way. Not long after that, I received an email saying that because it’s been such a buyer’s market, she and her partners had bought more than they anticipated this quarter and wouldn’t be buying again until next quarter.

Which is one month away.

I have spent this time continuing to analyze properties. And I’ve been learning about building my own business credit. While I LOVE the idea of Monica — with her TWELVE YEARS of experience — being my partner on my first purchases, I also know that eventually I’m going to want to buy them on my own.

I JUST now received two emails from Monica saying that she may be interested in moving forward on a couple of deals I sent her. She wrote:

Katy,
Thank you for sending the CFE for your deal.

As you know, there are many requirements that have to be analyzed then matched to our criteria before a deal can be presented for partnership.

Please make sure that you send me the following in ONE email:

* CFE including itemization of actual expenses from the last fiscal year (2009)
* 3 years of actual income and expenses
* Current rent roll
* 3 year proforma
* 12 pictures of the property
* Appraisal (if the property owner had one in the past 6 months)
* Business plan for how you will manage the property as part of the partnership requirements
* Affidavit from the seller or seller’s agent stating that the property is 85%+ occupied

Please go down the list and send me each of the above requirements so that I may present your deal to my investor partners for further review.

Sincerely,

Monica Main

I forwarded the email over to my broker in the area. Yes, I got myself a buyer’s broker to represent my interests. I pay him nothing. He’ll split the commission with the listing broker. He’s going to get to work on putting all this information together on both properties first thing in the morning. I, meanwhile, will be writing up the business plan for property management.

I’m so excited. Let me tell you just a few quick numbers about these two properties.

  • 131-unit property with a monthly cash flow of $9,462
  • 138-unit property with a monthly cash flow of $15,454

The way the partnership works, Monica and her partners get all the financing, and then I’d get half the equity and half the cash flow. So for these two, I’d get $4731 and $7727, respectively. If she wanted to go ahead with both properties, I’d make $12,458 and month.

You ready to do this too?

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Where Are Rates Going? (real estate investing)

For those of you following my progress with Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cashflow System, or if you’re trying to get financing for you own apartment building, I thought you’d like to see this email I received from Mr. Tracy A. Beer, Managing Director at MCB Madison.

There are many things to complain about in financing these days, but rates are not one of them. We are still enjoying Historically low rates. People say historically about a lot of things, but these rates really are unusual. In the last 40 years, rates have been at 7% or lower only 3 times. Up until the early 2000’s rates have gotten this low for only a total of about 2 years of market time.

Fannie can get under 5% on low leverage deals, Banks can do things in 5’s and Lifecos can reach into the low 6% range on some things. This is cheap rent for capital!

Going Up?

Lot’s of talk out there about rising rates. Here’s what we think will impact rates in order of how soon it might happen.

1) The Feds have been buying massive amounts of Residential loans and paper. This was to help keep rates down for Home-owners and Buyers. The Feds are now backing out of the market and will be entirely divested by early March. Residential rates WILL rise then and this will likely have the same effect on commercial rates.

2) Higher rates help Lenders heal and helps Lenders overcome risk fears. Lifecos are now starting to quote higher rates for higher loan to value ratios. This makes good business sense and we are a bit at a loss as to why the Lifecos have kept rates as low as they have. This is changing.

3) Fannie & Freddie are very sick, money losing institutions now effectively owned by the Feds. Fannie & Freddie routinely quote well below the competition for no good reason. This will change in the coming few months.

4) As I said, I write this in order of “how soon”. Inflation will come and it will push up rates, just when this will begin to assert itself is not clear.

The biggest problem for Borrowers is getting the loan amount they need. Once rates get to about 8.50% the Debt Coverage Ratios begin to dictate loan amount, as opposed to the LTV’s doing so. When that happens and as rates rise further, the coverage ratio requirements will push loan amounts below even permitted maximums. That won’t be fun.

So what do you do? If you can do a deal now, do it. For deals coming due in the next couple years DO THEM NOW!

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

US Residential Investment: A Sleeping Giant

For those of you smart people who are following my progress in buying my first apartment building using
Monica Main’s Apartment Cash Flow System (and hopefully taking steps toward buying your own), I thought you might like this article by CBRE Econometric Advisors Glab Nechayev and William Wheaton.

Residential investment is no longer a drag on the US economy. Instead, it will slowly return to being a major driver of domestic GDP growth and should play an important role in this recovery for a number of years.

Despite being a relatively small share of the U.S. gross domestic product (typically 3-4% of GDP), residential investment can have a more dramatic effect on GDP growth. This happens when residential investment increases or decreases. As the chart below shows, during the recessions of 1973-75 and 1980-82, residential investment subtracted close to a full percent from annual GDP growth but the added just as much in the first year or two of the subsequent recovery. In the last decade, residential investment’s effect was more sustained. In the thirteen years between 1993 and 2005 it added an average of 0.25% each year to GDP growth as construction steadily increased from 1.2 to 2.1 million units.

Housing Starts

Residential investment is realized through new construction activity and the relationship between the change in housing starts and residential investment’s contribution to GDP growth has been very close historically, as the chart above illustrates. Since housing starts peaked at an annualized pace of over 2.1 million units in 2006Q1, residential investment plunged and this has had a strong negative impact on economic growth. Starts declined continuously since then — finally bottoming out at a record low of 530,000 in 2009Q1 — two thirds below their historical average. During this period residential investment was subtracting about 1% from GDP growth on a yearly basis.

With housing starts increasing by 50,000 units in 2009Q3, residential investment added 0.5% to that quarter’s GDP growth — the first positive contribution in over three years. That is exactly what one would expect given the relationship observed historically between changes in housing starts and residential investment’s effect! So going forward into 2010 and beyond, just how much of a contribution to the U.S. GDP growth could residential investment provide?

To answer this question, one needs to consider where new supply (housing starts) currently is relative to new demand (primarily from household formation) as well as the existing housing overhang. At first it may seem surprising that housing starts would be rising at all given recent job losses, an already record-high residential vacancy rate, and foreclosure rates. Census is reporting that in 2009 there is over a million year-round vacant units for rent and for sale than when the housing correction began, and that new housing demand, measured by changes in the number of household (occupied units) are about 700,000 per year — half the historical average.

With annual housing demolitions of about 300,000 units, housing “demand” in 2009 has been about a million units — or twice the current construction. Moving into 2010, household formation should recover a bit — perhaps to 0.9 million, creating demand of 1.2 million. If construction rebounds a bit further — to about 700,000, then again there would remain “excess demand” of 0.5 million units. In short, by the end of 2010 — there should be little excess inventory.

From 2011 on, we should return to a more stable long term housing demand of 1.4 million units (1.1 million from household formation plus 0.3 million from demolitions and second home demand). Supposing construction still does not meet all of this demand (hence allowing prices to rise) it is quite reasonable to expect 2011 starts to increase to 0.9 million and then to 1.1 million in 2012, and finally 1.3 million in 2013.

This trajectory of “under supply” should allow prices to continue in recovery mode for the full 2010 to 2013 period. In such a scenario (graphed as a forecast in the chart above), the recovery of housing construction generates a 0.8% annual contribution to GDP growth — for 4 years. This cumulative boost of over 3% is far greater than during the recoveries from previous recessions and is exceeded only by the ramping up of housing construction right after World War II.

As a final point, we suggest that the year-to-date demand for new homes actually has been quite strong — it is only low in magnitude because we are not building any! In normal years, new home sales are about 75% of single family starts. The other 25% of units are in some sense “pre-sold” and directly contracted for. As shown in the chart below, during the last several quarters, this part of the market seems to have dried up as the sale of units in the pipeline has gobble dup virtually every new start. It is not surprising that all of the recent increase in overall housing starts was driven by the single-family segment which is already adding volume in expectation of a more robust demand down the road.

Housing Sales

Thus despite the glut of existing homes, there is still demand for new product. In fact one might argue that at current depressed construction levels there may even be “excess dmenad” — for newly constructed homes. This exists mainly in those parts of the country that did not over-build and that have been less hard hit by the recession. As a broader economic recovery solidifies in the coming years, residential investment will have to grow — a great deal, for a sustained period. Housing construction is a sleeping giant that is about to wake up.

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Amazing Financing for Apartment Buildings

For those of you who have purchased, (or who are thinking about purchasing) Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System, I wanted to share some good news on getting financing for your acquisition. I got this from Mr. Tracy A. Beer, Managing Director at MCB-Madison Finance.

There’s lots of talk these days about what’s hard to finance, the tough terms Lenders demand and the scarcity of capital. However, there are some amazingly good Lending programs out there and that’s what I’ll write about today.

APARTMENT FINANCING
There isn’t much government gets right. Congress’s pushing Fannie and Freddie to broaden their acceptable credit criteria played an instrumental role in the collapse. However, Fannie and Feddie are offering acceptionally good financing now…unintentionally.

Permanent Financing
While Freddie Mac offers good programs at good rates, they are not as aggressive or permissive as is Fannie Mae. Rates for “Low Leverage” – up to 75% Loan to Value are under 5.00%! Those rates are as low as 4.69%!

For “Full Leverage” – up to 80% Loan to Value rates are at 6.15% for a ten-year term! These rates make no sense and are anywhere from 75 to 350 basis points below Lifecos (who will only fund to 65 or 70% LTV) These loans are Non-recourse, Assumable and can fund more loan amount as income grows.

This program is hands down the best deal out there!

Now that the Feds are “officially” fully backing Fannie, things will change. We have seen loan to value ratios drop from a high of 85% in the last few months and we can’t believe rates will continue to be so low in comparison with the rest of the capital market. Get ‘em while you still can!!

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Apartments: It Gets Better

I just read this report by Gleb Nechayev, VP and Senior Economist of the CBRE Econometric Advisors. A lot of you have been following my progress with Monica Main’s Apartment Cash Flow System so I thought you would be interested to read this too.

The new year promises to be a better one for the apartment sector. With the U.S. economy expected to show some improvement in 2010, our outlook for multi-housing is cautiously optimistic. Rental demand should strengthen due to a more robust overall household formation and declining homeownership rate. With completions of new multi-housing product dropping sharply from the current pace, most markets are likely to see moderate improvement in occupancy and less severe effective rent declines in 2010, with additional momentum in 2011.

While the worst of the job losses are behind us, aftershocks such as rising unemployment and foreclosure rates, are still a concern for the economy. Today’s record overhang of vacant year-round housing still poses tangible risk to home prices and rents in many markets. In this respect, the national apartment market will remain in uncharted waters in terms of vacancy rates until the broader housing market shows convincing signs of recovery. In general, areas with stable employment bases, limited supply overhang, and declining affordability of owning should fare better in terms of apartment rate and revenue growth. Even in submarkets, however, property performance can vary widely depending on product type, condition, amenities, and street location.

Demand Trends
After a steep loss in apartment demand by the consumer over the first year of the depression, 2009 is on track for a positive net absorption. Property managers are offering incentives to attract and retain renters even in markets that are doing relatively well, possibly in anticipation of traditionally weak year-end leasing and uncertain early months of [this] year. It is encouraging to see that renters are taking advantage of these discounts as evidenced by improving net absorption. As the economy continues to improve and housing becomes less affordable, these concessions will dissipate and allow for effective rent growth to resume after 2010.

[my note: I'm pretty sure that means to BUY an apartment building NOW!]

More…

The total rental demand (i.e., including 1 to 4 unit family housing) continues to expand at near-record pace. This recent growth is a result of overall household formation and changes in homeownership rate, with the latter contributing the most. Over the five year period ending mid-2009, about 3.5 million households were added to the national rental pool, including in excess of a million households [in 2008]. With foreclosures still on the rise and home mortgage lending more stringent, homeownership is likely to continue falling from its current rate of 67.4% to about 66.0% by the end of [2010], boosting growth in rental households even further — perhaps by as much as a million above the long-term trend of 350,000 to 400,000 per year.

Homeownership Trends

Such record expansion in total rental demand provides a timely cushion for apartment occupancy — without it, the impact of record job losses on property performance would be much more negative. While declining homeownership does create a near-term tail-wind for apartments, it is important that foreclosures begin to taper off [this] year allowing home prices to stabilize and start recovering. A prolonged slump can lead to a tangible loss in apartments’ market share to other forms of housing. Conversely, stead or rising home sales and prices will make ownership less affordable, which would support increased rental demand over time, especially given the favorable age demographics.

Even in the environment of rapidly growing total rental demand, apartment properties will have to complete aggressively to retain existing tenants and attract new ones, especially those of good quality. There is evidence that markets with higher total vacancy rates also tend to see higher apartment rates. Not surprisingly, single-family prices and rents in such areas are also generally more affordable — another factor limiting apartment rent growth.

Supply Trends

One factor that should help ease competitive pressures on apartments next year is a minor reduction in new multi-housing supply. Judging by the number of projects which started in 2009, completions of properties with five or more units are expected to drop from the current annual pace of 250,000 units to about half that figure in 2010. Market-rate apartments will comprise fewer than 70,000 units nationally — less than half the average level of the prior twenty years and a new historical low for this segment.

The exact timing of deliveries does vary, however, and many projects are often deferred during recessions. There are still over 50,000 apartment units which started in 2008, whose current status is unclear. If construction for most of these projects was deferred rather than abandoned, the actual completions in 2010 could be significantly higher than expected.

Given today’s record-high apartment vacancy and depressed rents, however, completions are still likely to drop below historically low levels last seen in the aftermath of the real estate burst of the early 1990s. Moreover, a slow recovery in fundamentals along with highly constrained residential construction lending (at least for the moment) would limit the subsequent recovery in total multi-housing completions, keeping them at very low annual levels of about 100,000 units over the next few years. Some argue that a combination of record low new supply and pent-up rental demand would create conditions for above-average rent increases, or “spikes,” in 2011 to 2013 nationwide.

Housing Supply Trends

In our view, such a case can be made in markets with low housing affordability, high barrier to development, and sharp declines in apartment rent and revenues this this year and next.

2010 Outlook

The near-term outlook for apartment rents and revenues calls for a gradual recovery from the record declines experienced in 2009. Positive net absorption expected in 2010 should bring the national vacancy rate to 7.0%, or about 100 basis points below the peak. While the vacancy rate level will remain over 150 basis points above the long-term average next year, demand momentum is expected to curb further spread of rent discounts and concessions for new leases resulting in progressively smaller effective rent declines. Since the roots of this recession are in housing, however, cumulative peak-to-trough loss in apartment rents and revenues nationally will be more severe than after the 2001 recession and more comparable to those sustained in the early 1990s. After the 2001 recession, apartment performance benefited from rapidly rising home prices and massive rent-to-own conversions. It is just the opposite situation now: there is a record inventory of vacant single-family homes and condominiums, falling home prices, and own-to-rent conversions.

Job Growth

Employment trends aside, housing affordability is a key factor affecting apartments in this cycle and contributing to wider differentiation in rent growth across markets, submarkets, and product types. Variation in performance, already much wider than it has been historically, will likely widen even more as markets adjust to new economic realities. For the first time in over a decade apartment owners and managers have to operate in the environment when the primium to buy a median-priced single-family home or a condominium is much smaller relative to rents.

Declining homeownership rates and rising propensity to rent does boost aggregate rental demand but employment and household growth are more important for apartments. With fewer workers and households and reduced incomes, potential apartments demand cannot be realized, especially in locations with an over-supply of vacant single-family homes and condominiums for rent and for sale.

There are some signs, however, that home prices are stabilizing. The recent decline in sale duration for single-family homes indicates that markets are functioning as expected. A plunge in new house completions helped keep for-sale inventory at bay, and low prices attracted more buyers, including investors. It it important to look behind this facade, however, to see that much of the recent improvement is accounted for by Arizona, California, Florida, and Nevada — states whose housing busts were common among the triggers for the financial crisis and the national recession.

While home sales are indeed leveling out, these steep job losses of late-2008 and early-2009 have affected regular borrowers and foreclosures on fixed-rate mortgages now drive much of the distress. In California, Florida, and Nevada, current unemployment rates are not only well above the national average, they are also above their own historical peaks. Labor markets in these states must improve quickly ot they will risk facing new negative impacts from housing that can have national implications once again.

Stabilization and subsequent recovery in the labor market and home prices are both key to the multi-housing outlook. Judging by the current conditions, a tangible improvement in fundamentals is unlikely to begin for another year or so. We don’t expect “heaven in 2011″ either, but the road to a real recovery in apartment rents and revenues should clear by then.

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Discover the TOP 3 Deadly Mistakes Investors Make in Down Markets

I just read this post by Wendy Patton about the top three mistakes that real estate investors make in down markets. If you’ve been following along with my progress with Monica Main’s apartment system — or if you’re doing some other kind of real estaet investing — I thought that you would appreciate seeing this:

Down markets are without question one of the best times for real estate investors. Down markets contain the best opportunities and the greatest ability to make money. Any truly successful real estate investor will tell you that they do more deals and make more money in down markets than they do in up markets.

Here is what Billionaire J. Paul Getty had to say about investing in down Market:

“If you want to make money, really big money, you do what no one else is doing. Buy when everyone else is selling and sell when everyone else is buying. This is not merely a catchy slogan. It is the very essence of successful investment.”J. Paul Getty – Billionaire

While the opportunities are great in down markets, investors need to be aware of some of the deadly mistakes that can occur.

Here are the Top Three:

1. Not Getting Cash Flow
Cash flow is king, especially in down markets. It’s harder to get cash flow in seller’s markets, and even in some areas of the country, in a buyer’s market, because the prices are still too high for area rents. In down markets it’s very important to make sure your properties provide cash flow. You can’t count on appreciation in the short term in down markets. If a property cash flows, you can hold it forever, no matter what the market does. So, if it stays a down market for a while, you are okay because it cash flows. If the market goes back up, you can make money off appreciation too. Sell it then if you choose. The choice is yours then, because you’ve got the cash flow. CASH is KING!

2. Making Excuses
I touched on this before. If you want to succeed in real estate, you have to set aside the excuses and do it. Excuses are typically hidden in reasons why you can’t do it now. “I’m too busy.” Or the fear to take action by over analyzing every deal, “This property makes $5 less per month in cash flow than I really want.”
You’ve got to take action now. Picturing in your head all of the money you’ll make and the better life you’ll have with real estate investing is only fantasizing. If you want to make money in real estate; get started, take one step and then another. No one expects you to do it all at once or even do everything right, just get started.

3. Not Using a Proven System
There are some things in life we have to learn for ourselves. Making every mistake possible in real estate, just to learn the right way to do something is not one of those times. If you try that route, it will take you so much longer to get anywhere. You will literally be years behind, if you don’t give up entirely. A proven system is someone else’s road map that you can use to learn a real estate technique.
Proven systems give you the opportunity to skip the “getting lost” part. They move you forward at a much quicker (and safer) rate than if you tried to do it all on your own. It doesn’t matter what type of investing you want to do; short-sales, rehabs, or lease options, they will save you tens of thousands of dollars in mistakes, legal fees, etc.

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email

Monica Main’s Apartment Building Cash Flow System – Day 69

Last time I wrote, I told you about the three apartment buildings that looked like pretty good deals to me:

  1. a 192-unit property that cash flows at $24,353 per month
  2. a 134-unit property that cash flows at $14,283 per month
  3. a 164-unit property that cash flows at $18,185 per month

I heard back from Monica a few days later.

I regret to inform you that the commercial apartment building deals that you submitted for partnership consideration have been denied. The board of directors has based this decision on the properties being located in the XXXX area where they will not be investing at this time, during this first quarter of this year, due to their research and analyzation of current economic data and near future trends of the county and state. I understand this area will be reevaluated later this year as new data becomes available.

As you can imagine, I have mixed emotions. On the one hand, I admit, I was pretty excited about these deals — and even more excited about their cash flow. On the other hand, I feel relieved that I’m working with professional investors who just steered me clear of a bad area.

So I sent her two more potential deals, in two different states. I’m working on another deal that may be a go, but I have to wait until the broker gets back to me with the answers to a few questions before I know if I want to send it to Monica.

One broker who had been helping me called me up and told me how she used to own 3600 units, so she knows what it’s like from the owner side, and what it can be like buying your first building. She gave me a report about the growth in her area; I gave her my criteria.

And then I wrote out a short email explaining Monica’s criteria and emailed it out to a bunch of other brokers. One broker got back to me right away — now he’s looking for deals for me.

And I also instituted a referral program so that you can get a piece of the action too.

Do you see what I’m doing? I have a big goal. I want to own a cash flowing apartment building. I recognized that I could do much more, much faster, if I get a lot of experts, professionals, and regular people involved to help me.

I’m reminded by something my mom said last month. She said “You can’t predict the future.”

I said, “Yes you can. You can decide what you want your future to be like, and then you act accordingly.”

So, yes, I feel slightly discouraged about my now four deals being rejected. But I’ve also decided that I am going to OWN AN APARTMENT BUILDING.

Decide literally means “to cut off.” As in, cut off all your other options. When you decide, you are declaring that you will accept nothing less than the result you have chosen for yourself. When you decide to do something, you are making a covenant with yourself to see something through to completion.

UPDATE: Monica likes TWO of the properties I’ve sent her!

Share this post
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • BlinkList
  • Propeller
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • email